![]() |
Have you got a pearl of wisdom or a howler you've just got to share? Then drop us a line at maninnature@pacific.net.ph
See Wet & Windy Central for links to other jaw-dropping insights! |
| "The bottom line is that people don't have the right to manipulate or to breed dogs and cats ... If people want toys, they should buy inanimate objects. If they want companionship, they should seek it with their own kind." Ingrid Newkirk, co-founder, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PeTA), "Animals", May/June 1993. "You don't have to own squirrels and starlings to get enjoyment from them. ... One day we would like an end to pet shops and the breeding of animals. [Dogs] would pursue their natural lives in the wild ... they would have full lives, not waiting at home for someone to come home in the evening and pet them and then sit there and watch TV" "I don't use the word 'pet.' I think it's specieist language. I prefer 'companion animal.' For one thing, we would no longer allow breeding ... as the surplus of cats and dogs declined, eventually companion animals would be phased out, and we would return to a more symbiotic relationship - enjoyment at a distance." "Pet ownership is an absolutely abysmal situation brought about by human manipulation." "In the end, I think it would be lovely if we stopped this whole notion of pets altogether." "Let us allow the dog to disappear from our brick and concrete jungles -- from our firesides, from the leather nooses and chains by which we enslave it." |
|